I dunno, man...
...how did I become the Transgender Avenger? I know that some trans people on the Internet think I am a bad, bad, evil bigot person because I suggested that a cis woman's discomfort with their assumptions about gender POSSIBLY MIGHT NOT be rooted in privilege. I also didn't like the word "cisgender" as applied to me, but not for the reasons they assumed.* I shall not name the persons involved but I think said individual and zir friends are idiots. I have often been uncomfortable with the tendency to equate the felt experience of being a man or a woman with social constructions of same (which is what I see some trans people doing). I don't think that merely being trans reinscribes gender oppression, that's silly. But I do think doing that can. Can, doesn't have to.
But ya know, just because I think you're an idiot, or that you're stepping on my toes, doesn't mean that I want people to exclude you or be an asshole to you. And people keep saying stupid things about trans people in front of me, and I keep opening my mouth. Incident #1: One of the local Pagan groups I am a member of was approached by a nudist resort about having events there, which is all right. Except they have a policy against "transvestites" (their word). I and several other members of the group said, "Um. No." For these reasons: 1) we don't want to support exclusionary policies even at one remove, 2) we don't want to have to exclude potential members/attendees from some of our events because of where we have them, and 3) we DEFINITELY don't want to have to put that on our literature or announcements, as it would tend to put people off even from events they "could" come to. Also, my fourth, Capricornian reason: 4) I don't want to enter into any financial/business relationship with people who clearly have their heads up their asses.
Incident #2: I passed on a call for an anthology I have a poem in, because the editor wants more trans/genderqueer pieces for it. One of the places I passed it on was a Women's Studies list. I got a rude e-mail off-list about it. (The author was subtle enough not to attack the gender elements directly, but insinuated that the constraints meant the anthology was of low quality.) I told that person off and e-mailed the moderator....again, on the grounds that this kind of thing creates a hostile environment for trans folk and We Do Not Want That. She agreed with me and promised to do something about it.
*I would describe myself as cissexual but not cisgendered....neither cisgendered nor transgendered, but somewhere else. The distinction there is where a lot of my opinions come from...including the one about how you should not jump to conclusions about to whom you are speaking.
But ya know, just because I think you're an idiot, or that you're stepping on my toes, doesn't mean that I want people to exclude you or be an asshole to you. And people keep saying stupid things about trans people in front of me, and I keep opening my mouth. Incident #1: One of the local Pagan groups I am a member of was approached by a nudist resort about having events there, which is all right. Except they have a policy against "transvestites" (their word). I and several other members of the group said, "Um. No." For these reasons: 1) we don't want to support exclusionary policies even at one remove, 2) we don't want to have to exclude potential members/attendees from some of our events because of where we have them, and 3) we DEFINITELY don't want to have to put that on our literature or announcements, as it would tend to put people off even from events they "could" come to. Also, my fourth, Capricornian reason: 4) I don't want to enter into any financial/business relationship with people who clearly have their heads up their asses.
Incident #2: I passed on a call for an anthology I have a poem in, because the editor wants more trans/genderqueer pieces for it. One of the places I passed it on was a Women's Studies list. I got a rude e-mail off-list about it. (The author was subtle enough not to attack the gender elements directly, but insinuated that the constraints meant the anthology was of low quality.) I told that person off and e-mailed the moderator....again, on the grounds that this kind of thing creates a hostile environment for trans folk and We Do Not Want That. She agreed with me and promised to do something about it.
*I would describe myself as cissexual but not cisgendered....neither cisgendered nor transgendered, but somewhere else. The distinction there is where a lot of my opinions come from...including the one about how you should not jump to conclusions about to whom you are speaking.
no subject
no subject
For extra awesome, the excuse for why they didn't allow it was that it was "too hard" to explain to a child why a man was wearing a woman's clothes.
My reactions to that were: 1) "No, it isn't," and 2) "...at a nudist resort? Are you serious?"
no subject
And how is 'People wear all different kinds of clothes' any harder to say to a kid than 'We don't wear clothes at the resort, but we wear clothes to school'?
no subject
no subject
no subject
I encounter this all over, not just in pagan circles.
no subject
no subject
no subject
I am also not comfortable with the constraints and expectations that other people try to place on me, based on the conclusions they draw from looking at me; further, I have gender whims, in that some days I'm girly and some days I'm kind of butch.
This. Just because nature saddled me with big boobs doesn't mean I should have to conform to other's expectations of "womanhood".
That's why I really support the unlinking of gender role expectations and physical presentation. Because being shaped in a certain way shouldn't force you to act according to a certain set of expectations.
It's like saying every tall person (male or female) must excel at basketball, and play it all their lives. That tall person shouldn't have to have their legs shortened to be allowed to stay off the basketball court. (Yes, the analogy is silly, but so are gender roles, IMO.)
no subject
no subject